Bellingham slap clip has everyone talking

The key thing is that the alternative angle removes the ambiguity that the first view had. It does not prove intent, but it does make the act look less like incidental contact and more like a decision in the moment. That is why the debate has gone from a funny clip to people arguing over temperament and context.
 
Saw this in the pub on my phone and everyone just stopped talking for a second because it looks so stupid from that angle, one mate said it was like when a cat bats something off the table and another lad said he would be sent off in our Sunday league for less, then the whole table started arguing over whether Barco had said anything and nobody could agree because the clip gives you nothing to work with and that is what makes it so funny and so annoying at the same time
 
he really just walked up and did that like he was swatting a fly and now everyone is pretending there had to be some grand reason for it when the clip is right there looking daft as hell
 
At first I thought people were overreacting, because football clips can make normal contact look terrible when slowed down and replayed from a bad angle. But this one is hard to defend because the alternative view just makes it look so unnecessary and so petty, and once you have seen it that way it is difficult to unsee it. I know fans will rush to say Barco must have done something, because that is always the script when a big name is involved, but there is nothing in the clip itself to support that and that is why it is annoying people so much. It is not even about the force of it really, it is about how silly and avoidable it looks, and that is the bit that will stick with him, because now every replay is just making him look more like a fool and honestly i am getting more annoyed the more i watch it
 
jude just doing random violence like its a warm up drill and everyone in the comments acting like barca must have insulted his nan or something
 
The first angle leaves room for people to argue it was just a flashpoint, but the second angle is what changes the mood because it makes the whole thing look so needless and petty. That is why the discussion has gone from football to personality, because once a clip like this lands people stop asking what happened and start deciding what kind of bloke he is, and i get why because it looks bad, it really does, and if this is the image that sticks then he has only himself to blame because it was such a stupid thing to do and now everyone is laughing at him for it
 
nah i dont buy the whole he must have said something angle because people just make that up whenever a player does something dumb and the clip still looks bad either way
 
The most interesting part is how much the angle changes the interpretation of the same action. It shows how quickly a football clip can move from looking harmless to looking petulant when you change perspective.
 
Of course the officials will probably do nothing and that is exactly why people get fed up with this sort of thing because if some nobody in a lesser game did that there would be cards flying and everyone would be talking about discipline but when it is a superstar the whole thing gets brushed off as banter and then we are all supposed to pretend it is fine, the inconsistency in football is maddening and it always feels like the same names get away with stuff because they are too big to touch and then the rest of us are left watching clips like this and wondering what the point of rules even is
 
i saw the first clip and thought people were being dramatic but this angle actually made me say wtf out loud like he really did just do that and carry on as if nothing happened
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top