LuckyStrike77
Community Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2025
Rouven Kasper has basically said the quiet part out loud: if you only go by the numbers, it’s Harry Kane and everyone else is chasing shadows. 73 goals in 64 games is an absurd line no matter how you dress it up, and it’s got plenty of people saying the award should already be wrapped up.
At the same time, the whole Ballon d’Or debate always turns into a mess about trophies, reputation, and who people actually want to see up there. Kane’s case feels strong on pure output, but there are already plenty of arguments about whether that should be enough in a year like this. So, is it really that simple, or are people overcomplicating it again?
At the same time, the whole Ballon d’Or debate always turns into a mess about trophies, reputation, and who people actually want to see up there. Kane’s case feels strong on pure output, but there are already plenty of arguments about whether that should be enough in a year like this. So, is it really that simple, or are people overcomplicating it again?