Liverpool disallowed goal vs Manchester City sparks outrage over “interfering with play” call

[SoccerWizard]

The goal should stand. Short answer.

 

[StrikerLegend]

The whole subreddit said it. Game is gone.

 

[teno88]

clear sight. not interference. full stop

 

[thedreamer]

Allowing similar goals then denying this one shows selection bias.

 

[TheTactician]

If De Gea example is fine then this is fine too.

 

[TopScorer88]

The AR guessed. VAR protected the guess.

 

[UltimateBettor]

If you want this offside write it in plain terms.

 

[UltraBayern]

People cite the United example and they are right. It stood then.

 

[VARcheck]

Everyone had the same angle. No blocking.

 

[vargentina]

Process is broken. Outcome driven explanations after the fact.

 

[ViscaBarcelona2911]

Michael Oliver wants his summer cheques jokes write themselves

 

[WagerWizard]

Robertson does not screen. Keeper dives at the ball cleanly.

 

[BetKing42]

You cannot justify this with law language when the video shows clear sight.

 

[BetOnIt23]

Also love how the booth lads hedge until the ref decides then agree.

 

[CasualTactician]

VAR is not supposed to rubber stamp. It is to correct clear errors.

 

[championsclub]

If vision is claimed, show angles proving obstruction. None do.

 

[DanielBetting]

Donnarumma sees it the whole way.

 

[DefensiveWall]

Fans from all sides called it trash

 

[EthanGoal]

The comment about every corner being offside is spot on.

 

[Faker21]

Even City fans said overturn it. Still stood. Wow.