There is a sensible middle ground here. Isak is obviously very good, and the goal shows that, but it also came in a match where Sweden were already behind and the shape of the game had changed. That is why people should be careful with the grand conclusions, because a striker can look either anonymous or brilliant depending on the service and the space, and then everyone starts turning it into a personality test for the player. Also Graham Potter as Sweden manager was not on my bingo card at all and now I am more interested in that than the actual game, which says a lot about how strange this thread is